> As I suggested in the reply to Simon, I think that the change of FPW
> should be WAL-logged separately from that of HS parameters. ISTM
> packing them in one WAL record makes XLogReportParameters()
> quite confusing. Thought?
I want to confirm the reply of Simon. I think we cannot decide how this
code should be if there is not the reply.
> if (!shutdown && XLogStandbyInfoActive())
> + {
> LogStandbySnapshot(&checkPoint.oldestActiveXid,
> &checkPoint.nextXid);
> + XLogReportParameters(REPORT_ON_BACKEND);
> + }
>
> Why doesn't the change of FPW need to be WAL-logged when
> shutdown checkpoint is performed? It's helpful to add the comment
> explaining why.
Sure. I update the patch soon.
--------------------------------------------
Jun Ishizuka
NTT Software Corporation
TEL：045-317-7018
E-Mail: ishizuka....@po.ntts.co.jp
--------------------------------------------
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
