Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 13:19, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> On 27.10.2011 14:09, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> Yes. But that sounds unuserfriendly. Padding the WAL file manually
>>> is easy-to-do for a user?
> I'd definitely want to avoid anything that requires pg_receivexlog to
> actually *parse* the WAL. That'll make it way more complex than I'd
> like.
What parsing? Just pad to 16MB with zeroes. In fact, I think the
receiver should just create the file that size to start with, and then
write received data into it, much like normal WAL creation does.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
