> I'm about 99% sure the answer to that is 'yes'. Are you thinking of > having a background scheduler which handles the updating of > schedule-driven (instead of trigger-driven) MVs..? Not to try to > feature-creep this on you, but you might consider how a new backend > process which handles scheduled tasks could be generalized to go beyond > handling just MV updates.. :)
No feature-creeping; the two features described will be hard enough. Besides, we have pg_agent for that. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
