On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Perhaps that would be an acceptable initial version, but I'd be pretty > disappointed and I certainly don't think we should stop there.
I agree that a built-in job scheduler would be pretty awesome, but I think it's a completely separate project from materialized views. Each of the two is a major project all by itself; making one into a dependency of the other is a recipe for failure. In view of Kevin's success with SSI, I'm very pleased to see him picking this out as his next target. If and when it gets done, this will be a great, great feature. And we shouldn't be afraid to start small and move incrementally toward what we really want. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
