Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I was curious how 9.0 fared last year for comparison, here's that data:
> Version Date Days Weeks > 9.0.0 09/20/10 > 9.0.1 10/04/10 14 2.0 > 9.0.2 12/16/10 73 10.4 > 9.0.3 01/31/11 46 6.6 > 9.0.4 04/18/11 77 11.0 > 9.0.5 09/26/11 161 23.0 > So the average for the first three point releases was around 6 weeks apart. The 9.0.1 and 9.0.3 releases were both forced by security issues, so I think that's an unusually low average. Having said that, if enough people think that those backup issues are critical-data-loss problems, I won't stand in the way of making a release now. But like you, I'm not exactly convinced we're done with those issues. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers