On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > "nondeletable" is surely terrible, since they may well have got into > this state by being deleted. "nonremovable" is better, but still not > great.
Bit of brain storm, including looking over to terminology used for garbage collection: - stillreferenceable - notyetremovable - referenceable - reachable Perhaps those suggest some option that is a bit less horrible? I think I like referenceable best, of those. -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?" -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
