Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 24.11.2011 07:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> OK, that is a heap table. My only guess is that the heap is being
> > >> created without binary_upgrade_next_heap_pg_class_oid being set.
> > >> Looking at the code, I can't see how the heap could be created without
> > >> this happening. Another idea is that pg_dumpall isn't output the proper
> > >> value, but again, how is this data type different from the others.
> > >
> > > I have reproduced the failure and found it was code I added to pg_dump
> > > back in 9.0. The code didn't set the index oid for exclusion constraint
> > > indexes. Once these were added to the regression tests for range types
> > > recently, pg_upgrade threw an error.
> > >
> > > My assumption is that anyone trying to use an exclusion constraint with
> > > pg_upgrade will get the same type of error.
> > >
> > > Patch attached. Should it be backpatched to 9.0 and 9.1?
> >
> > If I understood correctly, pg_upgrade of a database with exclusion
> > constraints won't work without this patch? In that case, it should be
> > backpatched.
>
> Yes, that is my guess. I will test it today or tomorrow. I am
> surprised we had _no_ exclusion constraint tests in the regression tests
> until now.
I do see EXCLUDE constraints in 9.0, so I need to do some more research:
CREATE TABLE circles (
c1 CIRCLE,
c2 TEXT,
EXCLUDE USING gist
(c1 WITH &&, (c2::circle) WITH &&)
WHERE (circle_center(c1) <> '(0,0)')
);
It seems it is only the range-type EXCLUDE constraints that are causing
a problem.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
