Hi,

Hm. I just noticed a relatively big hole in the patch: The handling of 
deletion of dependent objects currently is nonexistant because they don't go 
through ProcessUtility...

Currently thinking what the best way to nicely implement that is. For other 
commands the original command string is passed - that obviously won't work for 
that case...

Andres


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to