2011/12/13 Albe Laurenz <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at>: > Pavel Stehule wrote: >>> One thing I forgot to mention: >>> I thought there was a consensus to add a WITH() or OPTIONS() clause >>> to pass options to the checker function: >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/12568.1322669...@sss.pgh.pa.us >>> >>> I think this should be there so that the API does not have to be >>> changed in the future. >>> > >> there is just one question - how propagate options to check functions >> >> I am thinking about third parameter - probably text array > > Either that, or couldn't you pass an option List as data type "internal"? >
this is question - internal is most simply solution, but then we cannot to call check function directly Regards Pavel > I don't know what is most natural or convenient. > > Yours, > Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
