On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Marti Raudsepp <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:28, Gianni Ciolli > <[email protected]> wrote: >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Autonomous_subtransactions >> >> It is meant to be an ongoing project, requesting comments and >> contributions, rather than a conclusive document. > > In addition to what Jim Nasby said, this proposal seems a bit > inflexible. In particular: > 1. It limits us to exactly 2 autonomous transactions at any time (the > main one and the "subtransaction").
It's not clear to me why you think there would be a limitation to exactly 2 autonomous transactions. The intention would be to have a theoretically unlimited number, subject to resource limits, just as normal subtransactions already do. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
