On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 21:43, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> (I do realize that allowing subtransactions to commit out of order >> also makes it failure prone) > > Uhm? You can't "commit" savepoints out of order. You can "release" an > older one, but then all the ones following it disappear and can't be > released separately.
We're confused about the terminology already :) I was talking about "autonomous subtransactions" as in COMMIT SUBTRANSACTION from the proposal. Earlier I commented that it would be nice if the syntax didn't require autonomous transactions to be strictly nested. Regards, Marti -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
