Florian Pflug <f...@phlo.org> writes: > So, I guess my question is, if we add safeguards against these sorts of > bugs for triggers, should we also add them to FOR UPDATE? Historically, > we seem to have taken the stand that modifications of self-updated tuples > should be ignored. If we're going to reverse that decision (which I think > Kevin has argued for quite convincingly), it seems consistent to complain > about all modifications to self-updated tuples, not only to those involving > triggers.
I'm not very convinced, except for the specific case of updates caused by cascaded triggers. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers