Florian Pflug <f...@phlo.org> writes: > On Jan12, 2012, at 17:30 , Tom Lane wrote: >> Actually, on reflection there might be a reason for checking >> update_ctid, with a view to allowing "harmless" cases.
> I've argued against that in the past, and I still think it's a bad idea. Well, the main argument for it in my mind is that we could avoid breaking existing behavior in cases where it's not clearly essential to do so. Perhaps that's less compelling than keeping the behavior simple, since it's true that the specific cases we could preserve the old behavior in are pretty infrequent. I'm not wedded to the idea, but would like to hear a few other peoples' opinions. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers