Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: >> Am I getting closer? > > Hmm, I would think you'd get assertion failures from calling > HeapTupleHeaderGetCmax when xmax isn't the current transaction. > (But I'm not sure that the regression tests really exercise such > cases ... did you try the isolation tests with this?) I didn't go farther than a `make check`, but I'm doing a more thorough set of tests now. > I was thinking we should probably define the cmax as being > returned only in SelfUpdated cases. I thought about that, but didn't see how it could be other than self-updated. If you do, I guess I missed something. > You failed to update assorted relevant comments, too. But I can > take it from here. I can take another pass to polish it if you'd like. I didn't expect this to be the last version I posted; I was afraid I might still have some restructuring to do. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
