On 16 January 2012 23:43, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > While Peter had a version of this that worked completely within the > boundaries of an extension, no one was really happy with that. At a minimum > the .length changes really need to land in 9.2 to enable this feature to > work well. As Daniel noted, it's a lot of code changes, but not a lot of > code complexity.
Right. As I've said in earlier threads, we're mostly just making the YYLTYPE representation closer to that of the default, which has the following fields: first_line, first_column, last_line and last_column. I just want two fields. I think we've already paid most of the price that this imposes, by using the @n feature in the first place. Certainly, I couldn't isolate any additional overhead. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
