Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Ouch. Is it really true that __attribute__((unused)) disables detection
>> of use of uninitialized variables?
> Oh, I think maybe I am confused. The downsides of disabling *unused*
> variable detection are obviously much less than the downsides of
> disabling *uninitialized* variable declaration... although neither is
> ideal.
OK. MHO is that __attribute__((unused)) is probably less annoying than
#ifdef overall. Also, it occurs to me that an intermediate macro
"PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY" would be a good idea, first because it
documents *why* you want to mark the variable as possibly unused,
and second because changing the macro definition would provide an easy way
to check for totally-unused variables, in case we wanted to periodically
make such checks.
This is all modulo the question of what pgindent will do with it,
which I would still like to see tested before we commit to a method.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
