On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Julien Tachoires <jul...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/12/15 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>: >> >> Uhm, surely you could compare the original toast tablespace to the heap >> tablespace, and if they differ, handle appropriately when creating the >> new toast table? Just pass down the toast tablespace into >> AlterTableCreateToastTable, instead of having it assume that >> rel->rd_rel->relnamespace is sufficient. This should be done in all >> cases where a toast tablespace is created, which shouldn't be more than >> a handful of them. > > Thank you, that way seems right. > Now, I distinguish before each creation of a TOAST table with > AlterTableCreateToastTable() : if it will create a new one or recreate > an existing one. > Thus, in create_toast_table() when toastTableSpace is equal to > InvalidOid, we are able : > - to fallback to the main table tablespace in case of new TOAST table creation > - to keep it previous tablespace in case of recreation. > > Here's a new version rebased against HEAD.
To ask more directly the question that's come up a few times upthread, why do *you* think this is useful? What motivated you to want this behavior, and/or how do you think it could benefit other PostgreSQL users? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
