On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@toroid.org> wrote: >>> This is just to confirm that the patch applies and builds and works >>> fine (though of course it does take a long time… pity there doesn't >>> seem to be any easy way to add progress indication like -i has). >> >> On any non server grade hardware you'd probably want to disable >> synchronous_commit while loading. FWIW, this is a great addition to >> pgbench. > > Do you object to separating out the three different things the patch > does and adding separate options for each one? If so, why? I find > them independently useful.
I didn't take a position on that -- although superficially it seems like more granular control is good (and you can always group options together with a 'super option' like as in cp -a) -- just making a general comment on the usefulness of testing against records that don't have the same xid. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
