Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Isn't it useful to print some messages on the log when we have "wrap around"?
>> In this case, we have an idea that wal_buffers needs to be increased.
> I was thinking about that. I think that what might be more useful
> than a log message is a counter somewhere in shared memory. Logging
> imposes a lot of overhead, which is exactly what we don't want here,
> and the volume might be quite high on a system that is bumping up
> against this problem. Of course then the question is... how would we
> expose the counter value?
Why do you need a counter, other than the current LSN? Surely the
number of WAL buffer ring cycles can be deduced directly from that.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
