On 02/22/2012 11:14 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
Returning to the original point, I've come to the conclusion that
"pure" isn't the right way to go. The trouble with "leakproof" is
that it doesn't point to what it is that's not leaking, which is
information rather than memory, as many might imagine (and I did)
without further hints. I'm not sure any single English word would
be as descriptive as I'd like.
Discreet?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discreet
I guess the risk is that people would confuse it with "discrete".
Yes, too confusing.
"silent" might be better along those lines.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
