Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of sáb mar 03 02:45:06 -0300 2012: > > Without correct registration you cannot to call PL check function > > directly simply. I don't thing so this is good price for removing a > > few SPI lines. I don't understand why you don't like SPI.
I don't dislike SPI in general. I just dislike using it internally in the backend. Other than RI, it's not used anywhere. > > It is used more times in code for similar purpose. > > this disallow direct PL check function call - so any more complex > situation cannot be solved by SQL, but must be solved by PL/pgSQL with > dynamic SQL Nonsense. Where did you get this idea? I did not touch the plpgsql code at all, it'd still work exactly as in your original patch. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
