2012/3/3 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>: > > Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of sáb mar 03 02:45:06 -0300 2012: > >> > Without correct registration you cannot to call PL check function >> > directly simply. I don't thing so this is good price for removing a >> > few SPI lines. I don't understand why you don't like SPI. > > I don't dislike SPI in general. I just dislike using it internally in > the backend. Other than RI, it's not used anywhere.
> >> > It is used more times in code for similar purpose. >> >> this disallow direct PL check function call - so any more complex >> situation cannot be solved by SQL, but must be solved by PL/pgSQL with >> dynamic SQL > > Nonsense. Where did you get this idea? I did not touch the plpgsql > code at all, it'd still work exactly as in your original patch. ok I am sorry Pavel > > -- > Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> > The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
