On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > I share your view here, and in fact the code for the patch has been > updated in only two ways since 1/15: adding support for new commands and > reacting to review (refactoring, cleaning, features removal, fix the > glitch). That's the reason why I can see we're very near the end of it, > the code churn is about to be over now.
Eh, maybe. I suspect you may be underestimating the amount of work left to do, but I'll reserve judgement until I read a new version of the patch. > It seems like February has seen lots of participants distracted away > from the commit fest, we should probably take this into account. Sure, I got knocked out for a week by my trip to Japan, and Tom was busy with other things, too, and Heikki went on vacation for a week. But, really, I don't think that's the main problem. If people are tired of working on the CommitFest, they're not going to get reinvigorated just because we let it go on for another month. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
