On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> * pg_stat_statements looks good also, I hope someone is looking at that > > I will take that one, if it ever gets marked RFC, but in the meantime > I plan to spend my time elsewhere. > >> At this stage the CF app isn't helping us much. We need some way to >> indicate who is actively working on review, not just a list of people >> who have at some point reviewed it. Patches without committers will >> likely suffer, so we need to be able to see the Committers column on >> the display, so we know whether a patch needs one assigned. > > I've kind of wished the Committer field could be seen in the list view > too, although I'm not sure what I'd give up for it (narrowing the other > fields doesn't sound good). Mainly what I wanted it for is to check > "is there anything I claimed and have not dealt with"; which is not > something I need to check every time I look, so perhaps some different > view could cover this need.
Yes, that's a good idea. > Another thing that would be really nice is the ability to sort open > items by last-activity time (disregarding the category labels), to make > it easier to spot which items are not receiving any attention. And another. My worry is things I care about, but may not be receiving the attention they deserve (IMHO) so I can do something about them before someone calls time. I guess that means I'd like to assign Importance values to them as well for my own use. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers