On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:48:07PM +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 19 March 2012 19:55, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > If someone wanted to bite the bullet and do the work, I think we could
> > move to a Perl/TAP-based test suite (not pgTAP, but Perl and some fairly
> > standard Test::* modules) and reduce that useless reformatting work and
> > test more interesting things. Just a thought ...
>
> I think that that is a good idea. However, I am not a Perl hacker,
> though this is the second time that that has left me at a disadvantage
> when working on Postgres, so I think it's probably time to learn a
> certain amount.
My blog entry on this topic might be helpful:
http://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2008.html#October_4_2008_2
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
