On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Robert, > > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> Thoughts? > > It was my impression that these patches were much about improving > overall tps and more about reducing latency spikes for specific > transactions that get hit by a checkpoint happening at a bad time. > > Are there any reductions in max latency for these pgbench runs..? > Assuming that's information you can get..
It looks like I neglected to record that information for the last set of runs. But I can try another set of runs and gather that information. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
