Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> At the very least, I would suggest that feature names are per-extension. > > Yeah, I had about come to that conclusion too. A global namespace for > them would be a mistake given lack of central coordination.
That's how I did it first, but Alvaro opposed to that because it allows for more than one extension to provide for the same feature name. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-03/msg01425.php Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
