On Mar 29, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > Frankly, I'm not sure we bet on the right horse in not mandating a > version numbering scheme from the beginning. But given that we > didn't, we probably don't want to get too forceful about it too > quickly. However, we could ease into it by documenting a recommended > numbering scheme and making features like version-dependencies work > only when that scheme is used.
PGXN mandates semantic versions for this reason (currently v1.0.0): http://semver.org/spec/v1.0.0.html Removes all the ambiguity. David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
