Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I would say that's an improvement. Do you think it isn't?
>> It seems like a log spam hazard at high connection rates. [ shrug... ] Failing to report a problem is a problem, too. By your argument any error message anywhere should be removed because it might be a "log spam hazard" at high reporting rates. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers