On 3 April 2012 19:16, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> I would say that's an improvement. Do you think it isn't? > >>> It seems like a log spam hazard at high connection rates. > > [ shrug... ] Failing to report a problem is a problem, too. By your > argument any error message anywhere should be removed because it might > be a "log spam hazard" at high reporting rates.
Surely there's a way to throttle it appropriately? -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
