Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > My guess is that all the ones defined in the SQL standard are > "expected" errors, more or less by definition, and thus not > interesting according to Peter G's criteria. On a scan through the list, I didn't see any exceptions to that, except for the "F0" class. To restate what the standard reserves for standard SQLSTATE values in the form of a regular expression, it looks like: '^[0-4A-H][0-9A-Z][0-4A-H][0-9A-Z][0-9A-Z]$' Eyeballing the errcode page in the docs, it looks like there are PostgreSQL-assigned values that start with '5', 'P', and 'X'. That "F0" class looks suspicious; are those really defined by standard or did we encroach on standard naming space with PostgreSQL-specific values?
We also have PostgreSQL-specific values in standard classes where we use 'P' for the third character, which is fine. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
