Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
>> That "F0" class looks suspicious; are those really defined by
>> standard or did we encroach on standard naming space with
>> PostgreSQL-specific values?
> 
> I think we screwed up on that :-(.  So we ought to renumber those
> codes anyway.  Perhaps use "PF" instead of "F0"?
 
Sounds good to me.
 
-Kevin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to