Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <[email protected]> writes: >> That "F0" class looks suspicious; are those really defined by >> standard or did we encroach on standard naming space with >> PostgreSQL-specific values? > > I think we screwed up on that :-(. So we ought to renumber those > codes anyway. Perhaps use "PF" instead of "F0"? Sounds good to me. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
