On 24 May 2012 13:37, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:
>> On 24 May 2012 13:05, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:
>>>> On 10 April 2012 21:07, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, April 6, 2012, Thom Brown wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've tried out pg_receivexlog and have noticed that when restarting
>>>>>> the cluster, pg_receivexlog gets cut off... it doesn't keep waiting.
>>>>>> This is surprising as the DBA would have to remember to start
>>>>>> pg_receivexlog up again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is intentional as far as that's how the code was written, there's 
>>>>> not a
>>>>> malfunctioning piece of code somewhere.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would probably make sense to have an auto-reconnect feature, and to 
>>>>> have
>>>>> an option to turn it on/off.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you haven't already (my wifi here is currently quite useless, which is
>>>>> why I'm working on my email backlog, so I can't check), please add it to 
>>>>> the
>>>>> open items list.
>>>>
>>>> I think it would also be useful to add a paragraph to the
>>>> documentation stating use-cases for this feature, and its advantages.
>>>
>>> Attached is a patch that implements this. Seems reasonable?
>>
>> s/non fatal/non-fatal/
>>
>> Yes, this solves the problem for me, except you forgot to translate
>> noloop in long_options[] . :)
> Fixed :-)
>
> Did you test it, or just assumed it worked? ;)

How very dare you. Of course I tested it.  It successfully reconnects
on multiple restarts, checks intermittently when I've stopped the
server, showing the connection error message, successfully continues
when I eventually bring the server back up, and doesn't attempt a
reconnect when using -n.

So looks good to me.

-- 
Thom

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to