Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:31:12AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't recall exactly what problems drove us to make pg_upgrade do
>> what it does with extensions, but we need a different fix for them.
> Uh, pg_upgrade doesn't do anything special with extensions, so it must
> have been something people did in pg_dump.
Most of the dirty work is in pg_dump --binary_upgrade, but it's pretty
disingenuous of you to disavow responsibility for those kluges. They
are part and parcel of pg_upgrade IMO.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
