On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 02:39:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:31:12AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I don't recall exactly what problems drove us to make pg_upgrade do > >> what it does with extensions, but we need a different fix for them. > > > Uh, pg_upgrade doesn't do anything special with extensions, so it must > > have been something people did in pg_dump. > > Most of the dirty work is in pg_dump --binary_upgrade, but it's pretty > disingenuous of you to disavow responsibility for those kluges. They > are part and parcel of pg_upgrade IMO.
True. I was just saying I did not write any of that code and have not studied it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
