Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > OK, time to get moving folks. Looks like the increase in the function > > args to 32 and the NAMEDATALEN to 128 has been sufficiently tested. > > I'm convinced by Joe's numbers that FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32 shouldn't hurt > too much. But have we done equivalent checks on NAMEDATALEN? In > particular, do we know what it does to the size of template1?
No, I thought we saw the number, was 30%? No, we did a test for 64. Can someone get us that number for 128? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
