Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >>Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>OK, time to get moving folks. Looks like the increase in the function >>>args to 32 and the NAMEDATALEN to 128 has been sufficiently tested. >> >>I'm convinced by Joe's numbers that FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32 shouldn't hurt >>too much. But have we done equivalent checks on NAMEDATALEN? In >>particular, do we know what it does to the size of template1? > > > No, I thought we saw the number, was 30%? No, we did a test for 64. > Can someone get us that number for 128? >
These are all with FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 16. #define NAMEDATALEN 32 du -h --max-depth=1 /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/ 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/1 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16862 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16863 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16864 3.2M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16865 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16866 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/17117 19M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base #define NAMEDATALEN 64 du -h --max-depth=1 /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/ 3.0M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/1 3.0M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16863 3.0M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16864 3.0M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16865 3.5M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16866 3.0M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16867 19M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base #define NAMEDATALEN 128 du -h --max-depth=1 /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/ 3.8M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/1 3.8M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16863 3.8M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16864 3.8M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16865 4.4M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16866 3.8M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16867 23M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base Joe ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
