> I think what you've really got here is inappropriate autovacuum cost > delay settings, and/or the logic in autovacuum.c to try to divvy up the > available I/O capacity by tweaking workers' delay settings isn't working > very well. It's hard to propose improvements without a lot more detail > than you've provided, though.
Wait, we *have* that logic? If so, that's the problem ... it's not working very well. What detail do you want? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers