Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> I think what you've really got here is inappropriate autovacuum cost
>> delay settings, and/or the logic in autovacuum.c to try to divvy up the
>> available I/O capacity by tweaking workers' delay settings isn't working
>> very well. It's hard to propose improvements without a lot more detail
>> than you've provided, though.
> Wait, we *have* that logic? If so, that's the problem ... it's not
> working very well.
> What detail do you want?
What's it doing? What do you think it should do instead?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
