2012-07-13 22:32 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
2012-07-12 19:05 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
I haven't really looked at the second patch yet, but at minimum that
will need some rebasing to match the API tweaks here.
Yes, I will do that.
While doing it, I discovered another bug you introduced.
enable_timeout_after(..., 0); would set an alarm instead of ignoring it.
Try SET deadlock_timeout = 0;
Same for enable_timeout_at(..., fin_time): if fin_time points to the past,
it enables a huge timeout that wouldn't possibly trigger for short
transactions but it's a bug nevertheless.
Thanks for your review and work.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
