On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The attached patch covers everything discussed in this thread, except > for the buggy handling of stats, which I think should be fixed in a > separate patch since it's only relevant to 9.2+.
With respect to this chunk: + * We do not need to go through this dance for temp relations, though, because + * we never make WAL entries for temp rels, and so a temp rel poses no threat + * to the health of a regular rel that has taken over its relfilenode number. ...I would say that a clearer way to put this is that temporary relations use a different file naming convention than permanent relations and therefore there can never be any confusion between the two. Other than that, looks fine to me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
