I wrote:
> I had thought that we might get a performance boost here by saving fsync
> queue traffic, but I see that md.c was already not calling
> register_dirty_segment for temp rels, so there's no joy there.
Actually, wait a second. We were smart enough to not send fsync
requests in the first place for temp rels. But we were not smart enough
to not call ForgetRelationFsyncRequests when deleting a temp rel,
which made for an entirely useless scan through the pending-fsyncs
table. So there could be win there, on top of not forwarding the actual
unlink operation.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
