On 08.08.2012 12:36, Jim Vanns wrote:
Ah ha. Yes, you're correct. It does mention here that an Int16 is used
to specify the number of parameter format codes, values etc.

I suggest then that the documentation is updated to reflect this? Anf
again, perhaps the 'int' for nParams should be an int16_t or short?

I don't think we should change the function signature for this, but I think a sanity check for "nParams < 32768" in libpq would be in order.

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to