On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 08.08.2012 12:36, Jim Vanns wrote: >> >> Ah ha. Yes, you're correct. It does mention here that an Int16 is used >> to specify the number of parameter format codes, values etc. >> >> I suggest then that the documentation is updated to reflect this? Anf >> again, perhaps the 'int' for nParams should be an int16_t or short? > > > I don't think we should change the function signature for this, but I think > a sanity check for "nParams < 32768" in libpq would be in order.
+1 - and also a clear update to the documentation. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
