> pg_largeobject.pageno is a signed int, so I don't think we can let it go > past 2^31-1, so half that. > > We could buy back the other bit if we redefined the column as oid > instead of int4 (to make it unsigned), but I think that would create > fairly considerable risk of confusion between the loid and pageno > columns (loid already being oid). I'd just as soon not go there, > at least not till we start seeing actual field complaints about > 4TB being paltry ;-)
Agreed. 4TB should be enough. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
