On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: >> pg_largeobject.pageno is a signed int, so I don't think we can let it go >> past 2^31-1, so half that. >> >> We could buy back the other bit if we redefined the column as oid >> instead of int4 (to make it unsigned), but I think that would create >> fairly considerable risk of confusion between the loid and pageno >> columns (loid already being oid). I'd just as soon not go there, >> at least not till we start seeing actual field complaints about >> 4TB being paltry ;-) > > Agreed. 4TB should be enough.
...for anybody! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
