On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
>>> On Aug 28, 2012 9:59 PM, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>> Well, why don't we just s/restoring/processing/ in the debug message,
>>>> and call it good?
>
>> Are we "allowed" to backpatch things to 9.2 at this point that changes
>> strings for translators?
>
> Well, not being a translator I'm not sure that I get a vote.
> But I'd think this is too minor to justify back-patching it.

Probably - that's why I didn't even consider going back beyond 9.2.

Anyway; I'll just leave it at master.


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to