Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > Frankly, I have had enough failures of parallel make that I think doing > this would generate a significant number of non-repeatable failures (I > had one just the other day that took three invocations of make to get > right). So I'm not sure doing this would advance us much, although I'm > open to persuasion.
Really? I routinely use -j4 for building, and it's been a long time since I've seen failures. I can believe that for instance "make check" in contrib would have a problem running in parallel, but the build process per se seems reliable enough from here. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers