On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Daniele Varrazzo's message of dom sep 23 22:02:51 -0300 2012: >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > As proposed by Masahiko, a single organization grouping all the tools (one >> > repository per tool) would be enough. Please note that github can also host >> > documentation. Bug tracker would be tool-dedicated in this case. >> >> From this PoV, pgFoundry allows your tool to be under >> http://yourtool.projects.postgresql.org instead of under a more >> generic namespace: I find it a nice and cozy place in the url space >> where to put your project. If pgFoundry will be dismissed I hope at >> least a hosting service for static pages will remain. > > I don't think that has been offered.
But I don't think it's necessarily the case that pgFoundry is getting "dismissed", either. I got a note from Marc Fournier not too long ago (sent to some probably-not-small set of people with pgFoundry accounts) indicating that they were planning to upgrade gForge as far as they could, and then switch to FusionForge <http://fusionforge.org/>, which is evidently the successor. It shouldn't be assumed that the upgrade process will be easy or quick. -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?" -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers