I am going to be unavailable until Wednesday, so maybe gives us a few more days for feedback.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Phil Sorber <p...@omniti.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Phil Sorber <p...@omniti.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Michael Paquier >> >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > 3) Having an output close to what ping actually does would also be >> >> > nice, >> >> > the >> >> > current output like Accepting/Rejecting Connections are not that >> >> >> >> Could you be more specific? Are you saying you don't want to see >> >> accepting/rejecting info output? >> > >> > OK sorry. >> > >> > I meant something like that for an accessible server: >> > $ pg_ping -c 3 -h server.com >> > PING server.com (192.168.1.3) >> > accept from 192.168.1.3: icmp_seq=0 time=0.241 ms >> > accept from 192.168.1.3: icmp_seq=0 time=0.240 ms >> > accept from 192.168.1.3: icmp_seq=0 time=0.242 ms >> > >> > Like that for a rejected connection: >> > reject from 192.168.1.3: icmp_seq=0 time=0.241 ms >> > >> > Like that for a timeout: >> > timeout from 192.168.1.3: icmp_seq=0 >> > Then print 1 line for each ping taken to stdout. >> >> How does icmp_seq fit into this? Or was that an oversight? >> >> Also, in standard ping if you don't pass -c it will continue to loop >> until interrupted. Would you suggest that pg_ping mimic that, or that >> we add an additional flag for that behavior? >> >> FWIW, I would use 'watch' with the existing output for cases that I >> would need something like that. > > We waited a couple of days for feedback for this feature. So based on all > the comments provided by everybody on this thread, perhaps we should move on > and implement the options that would make pg_ping a better wrapper for > PQPing. Comments? > -- > Michael Paquier > http://michael.otacoo.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
